E-Commerce Cloud Monopoly vs Omni-Channel Retail Fortress
AMZN vs WMT: Head-to-Head Comparison
Comparing quantitative economic moats, Forward P/E multiples, balance sheet liquidity, and institutional 13F whale conviction.
👑 Higher Moat Score
AMZ
AMZN 🇺🇸
Amazon.com, Inc.
$256.78
+1.94%
MOAT SCORE
⚡ 91.5/100
VS
📊 Quantitative Fundamental Matchup
| Fundamental Metric | AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) | WMT (Walmart Inc.) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score™ (0-100) | ⚡ 91.5 | ⚡ 85.0 | AMZN (+6.5 pts) |
| Market Capitalization | $2.8T | $820.4B | - |
| Forward P/E Ratio | 19.9x | 35.8x | AMZN (Cheaper Multiple) |
| Trailing P/E Ratio | 20.7x | 37.4x | - |
| Gross Profit Margin | 50.8% | 25.2% | AMZN (Higher Pricing Power) |
| YoY Revenue Growth | +19.6% | +5.9% | AMZN |
| Free Cash Flow | $3.2B | $9.0B | - |
| Superinvestor 13F Backing | Nancy Pelosi | None Tracked | AMZN |
🏆 The MoatPicks Verdict: AMZN Wins on Fundamentals
Based on our 12-point quantitative audit, AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) achieves an overall Moat Score of 91.5/100 compared to 85.0/100 for WMT. AMZN demonstrates superior capital allocation efficiency and wider defensive moat characteristics in the Consumer sector.
Find All 100+ Top-Ranked Moat Compounders
Get real-time 3-hour price updates, 13F whale transaction alerts, and complete 12-point fundamental breakdowns.
Unlock MoatPicks PRO →