Membership Warehouse Fortress vs Mass Merchandiser
COST vs TGT: Head-to-Head Comparison
Comparing quantitative economic moats, Forward P/E multiples, balance sheet liquidity, and institutional 13F whale conviction.
👑 Higher Moat Score
COS
COST 🇺🇸
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$904.77
+0.26%
MOAT SCORE
⚡ 89.0/100
VS
📊 Quantitative Fundamental Matchup
| Fundamental Metric | COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) | TGT (Target Corporation) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score™ (0-100) | ⚡ 89.0 | ⚡ 73.0 | COST (+16.0 pts) |
| Market Capitalization | $401.2B | $70.8B | - |
| Forward P/E Ratio | 44.0x | 15.2x | TGT (Cheaper Multiple) |
| Trailing P/E Ratio | 45.5x | 16.1x | - |
| Gross Profit Margin | 12.9% | 28.4% | TGT (Higher Pricing Power) |
| YoY Revenue Growth | +21.5% | +5.3% | COST |
| Free Cash Flow | $7.0B | $3.4B | - |
| Superinvestor 13F Backing | None Tracked | None Tracked | TGT |
🏆 The MoatPicks Verdict: COST Wins on Fundamentals
Based on our 12-point quantitative audit, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) achieves an overall Moat Score of 89.0/100 compared to 73.0/100 for TGT. COST demonstrates superior capital allocation efficiency and wider defensive moat characteristics in the Consumer sector.
Find All 100+ Top-Ranked Moat Compounders
Get real-time 3-hour price updates, 13F whale transaction alerts, and complete 12-point fundamental breakdowns.
Unlock MoatPicks PRO →