Electrical Grid Infrastructure & Transformers vs Substation Construction
ETN vs PWR: Head-to-Head Comparison
Comparing quantitative economic moats, Forward P/E multiples, balance sheet liquidity, and institutional 13F whale conviction.
👑 Higher Moat Score
ETN
ETN 🇺🇸
Eaton Corporation, PLC
$402.78
+0.0%
MOAT SCORE
⚡ 85.0/100
VS
📊 Quantitative Fundamental Matchup
| Fundamental Metric | ETN (Eaton Corporation, PLC) | PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score™ (0-100) | ⚡ 85.0 | ⚡ 85.0 | ETN (+0.0 pts) |
| Market Capitalization | $156.4B | $90.6B | - |
| Forward P/E Ratio | 29.8x | 36.0x | ETN (Cheaper Multiple) |
| Trailing P/E Ratio | 41.0x | 68.7x | - |
| Gross Profit Margin | 36.0% | 15.5% | ETN (Higher Pricing Power) |
| YoY Revenue Growth | +21.4% | +41.1% | PWR |
| Free Cash Flow | $3.1B | $2.0B | - |
| Superinvestor 13F Backing | None Tracked | None Tracked | PWR |
🏆 The MoatPicks Verdict: ETN Wins on Fundamentals
Based on our 12-point quantitative audit, ETN (Eaton Corporation, PLC) achieves an overall Moat Score of 85.0/100 compared to 85.0/100 for PWR. ETN demonstrates superior capital allocation efficiency and wider defensive moat characteristics in the Industrials sector.
Find All 100+ Top-Ranked Moat Compounders
Get real-time 3-hour price updates, 13F whale transaction alerts, and complete 12-point fundamental breakdowns.
Unlock MoatPicks PRO →