Energy & Oil Supermajors: Upstream Permian Basin Titans
XOM vs CVX: Head-to-Head Comparison
Comparing quantitative economic moats, Forward P/E multiples, balance sheet liquidity, and institutional 13F whale conviction.
👑 Higher Moat Score
XOM
XOM 🇺🇸
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
$165.99
+0.46%
MOAT SCORE
⚡ 84.0/100
VS
📊 Quantitative Fundamental Matchup
| Fundamental Metric | XOM (ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation) | CVX (Chevron Corporation) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score™ (0-100) | ⚡ 84.0 | ⚡ 83.0 | XOM (+1.0 pts) |
| Market Capitalization | $682.5B | $419.9B | - |
| Forward P/E Ratio | 14.1x | 13.3x | CVX (Cheaper Multiple) |
| Trailing P/E Ratio | 21.4x | 20.6x | - |
| Gross Profit Margin | 29.8% | 44.3% | CVX (Higher Pricing Power) |
| YoY Revenue Growth | +44.1% | +53.5% | CVX |
| Free Cash Flow | $20.7B | $21.9B | - |
| Superinvestor 13F Backing | None Tracked | None Tracked | - |
🏆 The MoatPicks Verdict: XOM Wins on Fundamentals
Based on our 12-point quantitative audit, XOM (ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation) achieves an overall Moat Score of 84.0/100 compared to 83.0/100 for CVX. XOM demonstrates superior capital allocation efficiency, wider gross margins, and stronger defensive economic moat characteristics in the Energy & Oil Supermajors sector.
Find All 100+ Top-Ranked Moat Compounders
Get real-time 3-hour price updates, 13F whale transaction alerts, and complete 12-point fundamental breakdowns.
Unlock MoatPicks PRO →